search the IfM or University web pages an A to Z list of page content and information on this site
IfM logo Institute for Manufacturing link to the University of Cambridge home page
Dept of Engineering
IfM Home
about IfM
News
Address / directions
People
Research
Education
Vacancies
Work with IfM
Events & courses
Books
Local

Decision support tools

a picture of something

References

  • Porter ME, 1979 Mar/Apr, 'How competitive forces shape strategy', Harvard Business Review.
  • Porter ME, 1980, "Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors". The Free Press.
  • Porter ME, "Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy", Strategic Management Journal 1991, vol. 12, 95-117.

Porter's 5 Forces

diagram of Porter's 5 Forces

A framework for diagnosing industry structure, built around five competitive forces that erode long-term industry average profitability. The industry structure framework can be applied at the level of the industry, the strategic group (or group of firms with similar strategies) or even the individual firm. Its ultimate function is to explain the sustainability of profits against bargaining and against direct and indirect competition.

Porter's five forces, or factors that shape business strategy are:

  • Threat of entry to the market from other organisations
  • Supplier power
  • Buyer power
  • Availability of substitute products
  • Existing competitors

The elements involved with each force are shown in the lists below

Entry Barriers

  • Economies of scale
  • Proprietary product differences
  • Brand identity
  • Switching costs
  • capital requirements
  • Access to distribution
  • Absolute cost advantages
  • Proprietary learning curve
  • Access to necessary inputs
  • Proprietary low-cost product design
  • Government policy
  • Expected retaliation

Determinants of Supplier Power

  • Differentiation of inputs
  • Switching costs of suppliers and firms in the industry
  • Presence of substitute inputs
  • Supplier concentration
  • Importance of volume to supplier
  • Cost relative to total purchases in the industry
  • Impact of inputs on cost or differentiation
  • Threat of forward integration relative to threat of backward integration by firms in the industry

Determinants of Buyer Power

Bargaining Leverage
  • Buyer concentration versus firm concentration
  • Buyer volume
  • Buyer switching costs relative to firm switching costs
  • Buyer information
  • Ability to backward integrate
  • Substitute products
  • Pull-through
    Price Sensitivity
  • Price / total purchases
  • Product differences
  • Brand identity
  • Impact on quality / performance
  • Buyers profits
  • Decision makers' incentives

Rivalry Determinants

  • Industry growth
  • Fixed (or storage) costs/value added
  • Intermittent over capacity
  • Product differences
  • Brand identity
  • Switching costs
  • Concentration and balance
  • Informational over complexity
  • Diversity of competitors
  • Corporate stakes
  • Exit barriers

Determinants of Substitution Threats

  • Relative price performance of substitutes
  • Switching costs
  • Buyer propensity to substitute

 


a-z site index | about the IfM | the Institute for Manufacturing is a part of the Department of Engineering | Go to top of page

This page is from the Institute for Manufacturing, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk