search the IfM or University web pages an A to Z list of page content and information on this site
IfM logo Institute for Manufacturing link to the University of Cambridge home page
Dept of Engineering
IfM Home
about IfM
News
Address / directions
People
Research
Education
Vacancies
Work with IfM
Events & courses
Books
Local

Design Management Group

lenses


Contact

James Moultrie
Institute for Manufacturing
17 Charles Babbage Road,
Cambridge, CB3 0FS, UK

Tel: +44 1223 764830

Teamwork

Product development is inherently a collaborative activity, involving both internal groups (e.g. Engineering, Marketing, Manufacturing, Sales & Service etc) and external partners (customers, technology suppliers, material/component suppliers, co-development partners, subcontractors, contract manufacturers, sales distributors etc).

Few firms have all the skills and resources to develop technologically complex products themselves. Increasingly, firms choose to concentrate on core technologies and opt to collaborate with others to gain access to complementary skills and resources. Others have experienced downsizing and have little choice but to outsource a number of operations. This may sometimes include design and development activities where the design responsibility for a part or subsystem is either shared or wholly delegated to a third party.

over the wall graphic

Figure 1: The "Over the wall" method

Intra-organisational teamwork

Traditionally, many companies have had a strong functional organisation with projects handed off from one department to the next. This has become known as the 'relay race' or 'over-the-wall' method. More recently, companies have adopted a cross-functional approach ('rugby team') where a core team is responsible for taking the project from concept through to delivery. The core team contains representatives of the most important functional groups, and is augmented from time to time with representatives from other areas as required. This may include suppliers where appropriate.

core team graphic

Figure 2: Cross-functional core team (based on McGrath (1996)

Inter-organisational teamwork

There are many collaborative forms, ranging from equity relationships such as Joint Ventures or Mergers and Acquisitions at one end of the spectrum to straightforward market transactions at the other. Collaborative product development is an intermediate form where design responsibility is split between two (or more) companies. The resultant product is generally marketed by one of the partners, but may also be marketed by others in non-competitive markets.

Supplier management

Traditionally, supplier management has been a Purchasing responsibility with adversarial or price-based relationships the norm. Increasingly, supplier involvement or partnership is being sought in an attempt to improve the performance of the supply chain. Similar partnerships are emerging in the design chain with various forms of technological collaboration in the product design and development process. Thus design collaborations arise both from the sharing of design and development tasks, and from supplier development or early supplier involvement (ESI). The distinction between these two scenarios is becoming increasingly blurred, as many of the critical issues are common to both.

trust versus contract matrix

Figure 3: Trust v Contract

Improving Collaborative capability

External collaboration is acknowledged to be difficult, but is increasingly being seen to be a fact of life, and the capacity to collaborate successfully can be considered to confer competitive advantage. It has however been recognised that alliances commonly fail because operating managers do not make them work, rather than for technical or contractual reasons. In successful product development collaborations, the contract is seen as a basis for partnership, open to some renegotiation, rather than as a mechanism to guard against mistrust and opportunism. Much is taken on trust in these projects.

Further information

  • Bidault F., Despres C. and Butler, C. (1998) Leveraged Innovation: Unlocking the innovation potential of strategic supply. Basingstoke: Macmillan
  • Bruce, Margaret and Jevnaker, Birgit H. (Eds) (1998) Management of design alliances: sustaining competitive advantage, Chichester: Wiley
  • Doz, Y. and Hamel, G. (1998) Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
  • Duarte, D. and Snyder, N. (2001) Mastering Virtual Teams (second edition), San Francisco:Jossey-Bass
  • Dussauge, P. and Garette, B. (1999) Cooperative Strategy: Competing successfully through strategic alliances. Chichester : Wiley
  • Lamming, R. (1993) Beyond partnership: strategies for innovation and lean supply, New York; London: Prentice Hall
  • McGrath M E, (1996), Setting the PACE in product development: a guide to product and cycle time excellence, Butterworth-Heinemann, USA
  • Macbeth, D. and Ferguson, N. (1994) Partnership sourcing: an integrated supply chain management approach, London: Financial Times: Pitman Publishing

 


a-z site index | about the IfM | the Institute for Manufacturing is a part of the Department of Engineering | Go to top of page

This page is from the Institute for Manufacturing, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk