search the IfM or University web pages an A to Z list of page content and information on this site
IfM logo Institute for Manufacturing link to the University of Cambridge home page
Dept of Engineering
IfM Home
about IfM
News
Address / directions
People
Research
Education
Vacancies
Work with IfM
Events & courses
Books
Local

Centre for Strategy and Performance

Gerry Frizelle presenting

Further information

Dr Ken Platts
Centre for Strategy and Performance
Institute for Manufacturing
17 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge, CB3 0FS , UK

Tel: +44 (0) 1223 337085
Fax: +44 (0) 1223 766400
Email: csp-enquiriesat symboleng.cam.ac.uk

Complexity in the supply chain

Backgound

The project arose from an EPSRC initiative on systems integration. The idea was to apply measurement techniques developed for measuring complexity in factories, to supply chains (see Complexity in Manufacturing). The basic idea is that the presence of complexity disrupts the flow of materials and information between the customer and his supplier, by creating barriers.

Aims

The aim of the research was to test the hypothesis that the presence of complexity inhibits supply chain integration.

Objectives

The objectives were to take measurements of information and material flows between a company and one of its suppliers, to reveal where integration is falling down and see if this has some basis in the complexity of the total process.

Results

It proved possible to show not only that complexity prevents supply chains from integrating, but also to identify specific factors involved. Not surprisingly, issues such as varying levels of demand, uncertain demand patterns and unreliable manufacturing operations contributed. However the study produced some unexpected findings. For example other inhibitors included incompatible IT systems, differing performance measurement systems and even the policy of holding inventories within the chain.

As a consequence, the study raised questions about the desirability of following a strategy of supply chain integration. Findings suggested that such policies could removed the freedom of the partners to act in their own best interests, and would make the resulting chains much less robust.

The project also concluded that there was little evidence for the presence of the Forrester or Bullwhip effect in the chains studied. What happened instead was that suppliers were used to attenuate the uncertainty generated by their customers (exporting complexity to the supplier). It also proved possible to demonstrate that reducing complexity in a supply chain also reduces operating costs. The chart below shows savings actually achieved against change in the complexity index. The numbers on the x axis represent distinct cost savings initiatives.

graph of savings Vs. complexity changes

Finally, the original mathematical model used for factory measurement was found to be impractical for supply chains. The reason was that the added complexity of supply chains meant that the factory data gathered methodology could not be used here; the data volumes needed would have overwhelmed the observers. A different approach was developed involving observing changes in the chain such as stock movements, alterations in delivery dates and delivery quantities. This new model appears to lend itself to the automatic collection of data and to supply chain monitoring.

Sponsors / Collaborators

EPSRC

Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford

British Aerospace Systems and Equipment

Unilever

AEA Technology.

Researchers

Gerry Frizelle

Yue Wu

Rabia Shirazi

Erik van der Merwe

Dehua Zhou

Laurent Ayral

Link to Manufacturing Complexity Network Conference 2002

 


a-z site index | about the IfM | the Institute for Manufacturing is a part of the Department of Engineering | Go to top of page

This page is from the Institute for Manufacturing, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk